NVIDIA H200 SXM vs NVIDIA Rubin CPX
How the NVIDIA H200 SXM and NVIDIA Rubin CPX compare across memory, compute, power and form factor, with the stronger figure highlighted on each row.
| Specification |
HOPPER
NVIDIA H200 SXM
View Product →
|
RUBIN
NVIDIA Rubin CPX
View Product →
|
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Price | – | – |
| Overview | ||
| Architecture | Hopper | Rubin (CPX variant) |
| Memory | ||
| Memory | 141 GB HBM3e | HBM4 (capacity per partner configuration) |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4.8 TB/s | – |
| Compute | ||
| FP32 | 67 TFLOPS | – |
| FP16/BF16 Tensor | 1,979 TFLOPS | – |
| FP8 Tensor | 3,958 TFLOPS | – |
| INT8 Tensor | 3,958 TOPS | – |
| Platform | ||
| Interface | Gen5 128 GB/s | – |
| NVLink | 900 GB/s (4th Gen) | NVLink 6, PCIe Gen 6 |
| TDP | Up to 700W (configurable) | – |
| Form Factor | SXM | SXM / rack-integrated |
| Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) | Up to 7 instances | – |
Not sure which fits?
Talk to an Expert →
Talk it through with a specialist
Tell us your workload and we will recommend the right GPU, configuration, and sourcing options.