Skip to content
NVNEXUS
GPU Comparison

NVIDIA A16 vs AMD Instinct MI210

How the NVIDIA A16 and AMD Instinct MI210 compare across memory, compute, power and form factor, with the stronger figure highlighted on each row. Vendor-specific figures (CUDA vs stream processors, Tensor vs matrix cores) are listed on their own rows.

Specification NVIDIA A16 AMPERE NVIDIA A16 View Product CDNA 2 AMD Instinct MI210 NVIDIA alternative: NVIDIA A100 80GB
Pricing
Price Not sold by NVNexus
Overview
Architecture Ampere AMD CDNA 2
Memory
Memory 64 GB GDDR6 ECC (4× 16 GB) 64 GB HBM2e
Memory Bandwidth 4× 232 GB/s 1.6 TB/s
Memory Interface 4096-bit
Compute
CUDA Cores 5,120 (4× 1,280)
Stream Processors (AMD) 6,656 (104 CUs)
Tensor Cores 160 (4× 40)
Matrix Cores / AI Accelerators (AMD) 416
RT Cores / Ray Accelerators 40 (4× 10)
FP32 45.3 TFLOPS (matrix)
FP64 Tensor 45.3 TFLOPS (matrix)
FP16/BF16 Tensor 181 TFLOPS
INT8 Tensor 181 TOPS
Platform
Interface PCIe Gen4 x16 PCIe Gen4 x16
NVLink / Infinity Fabric Infinity Fabric bridges, 300 GB/s
TDP 250W 300W
Form Factor Dual-slot, full-height, passive Dual-slot PCIe, passive
GPUs per Board 4
Cooling Passive (chassis airflow)
Not sure which fits?

Talk it through with a specialist

Tell us your workload and we will recommend the right GPU, configuration, and sourcing options.

Talk to an Expert

More Comparisons